Allscripts Interoperability with Epic
Jalil Bryant
Jacksonville University
Jacksonville University
Most people consider the healthcare field to be a high
pressure and demanding area that requires special people to be able to succeed
within the field. Sometimes the job
isn’t necessarily hard but instead the process of performing the job duties is
the problem. This can be especially true
when talking about case managers. Case
managers at this author’s facility utilizes two systems, these include
Allscripts and Epic. The problem is that
these two systems aren’t interoperable with each other. Interoperability between Allscripts and Epic
would make life easier for all members of the patient care team at the organization. Interoperability between information systems
within a healthcare organization should be an expectation not the exception. There’s no reason why a healthcare employee
has to document the same information for the same patient in two different
systems.
What is Allscripts
Allscripts is an open platform that allows for facilities to
send prescriptions (EHRGuide, 2019). At
this author’s facility, case managers use this system to send referrals to
various companies. Case managers can send
referrals to hospice agencies, home health companies, skilled nursing
facilities, acute rehab facilities, long term acute care facilities, and
durable medical equipment companies. In
order to send referrals case managers must upload medical orders and clinical
documentation to Allscripts, and send them electronically to the desired
company. Once the desired company
receives the referral they will follow up with the case manager either via
phone call or by messaging in Allscripts.
The Problem
The problem is that Allscripts doesn’t communicate with Epic
at this author’s facility. This puts a
strain on the case managers when documenting because they have to essentially
double document their discharge planning assessments. These discharge planning assessments consists
of interviewing the patients about their living situations, while trying to
find areas where the patient can receive the appropriate support at home with
the goal of achieving the optimal health outcome for the patient. After the assessment, case managers must then
document the assessment into EPIC. Due
to Allscripts and Epic lacking interoperability between each other, the case
managers then have to log into Allscripts and input the same information that
they documented in EPIC. This is very
time consuming especially while working in a level one trauma center. For example, most days this author has over
25 patients to document on, and the hospital has a high turnover rate.
Another problem is that only case managers has access to Allscripts
at the facility. Thus whenever an agency
or company sends an update status on a referral, the case managers are the only
ones that can view the update. As most
people know, not all healthcare professionals have great communication skills
and the same can be said about some case managers as well. So if the case manager forgets to give a
verbal update to the physicians, nurses, or other staff members this can lead
to a lot of problems; some of which includes discharge delays, mistrust, wrong information
dissemination, and frustration from the patients and staff members. All of this can avoided if the rest of the healthcare
team had the ability to log into Epic and check the status of a referral at a
moment’s notice. There’s no reason why
the EHRs systems within the same facility shouldn’t be interoperable with one
another.
Recommendations for Improvement
One recommendation for fixing this problem is to make Allscripts
interoperable with Epic. When a
healthcare organization is using different software systems, there should be an
effort made to ensure interoperability. The
preferred type of interoperability would be semantic. Semantic interoperability is when the message
keeps its structure during a transfer, which allows for the receiving system to
interpret and use the data (Ultimate Medical Academy, 2018). A focus on interoperability would help EHRs
to reach their full potential (Ultimate Medical Academy, 2018). Epic is the most widely used EHR system in
the U.S, and is very interoperable with other software systems (HealthIT,
2014). After reading several websites,
it is a shared belief that Allscripts along with many vendors should be looking
for ways to improve its interoperability with other systems. So Epic has already demonstrated
interoperability features over the past couple of years, it’s time for
Allscripts to evolve as well.
Over the past decade there has been a major push for healthcare
organizations to utilize EHRs, they receive incentives from the Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).
That said, another recommendation is to place a focus on providing
incentives for healthcare organizations to use systems that utilize
interoperability features. It seems like
this shift of focus has already occurred.
CMS has renamed their EHR Incentive Programs to the Promoting
Interoperability Programs (CMS, 2018). A
result of this program is that it will force health IT developers and health
care providers to either update their current system, or to implement other
systems that better support interoperable features (CMS, 2019).
The last recommendation is to give the rest of the staff the
ability to log into Allscripts to view the updates. This doesn’t mean to give them the ability to
send referrals but just to be able to view the updates and statuses of
referrals. This way all members of the interdisciplinary team can actively know
what is going on with the patient at all times.
This would lead to less confusion and frustration; while keeping
everyone in sync with the patient’s care.
Impact on Nursing Care and Patient Health Outcomes
Interoperability between Allscripts and Epic would allow for
case managers to be more productive.
This would tremendously reduce the time it takes for a case manager to
document. As mentioned before, case
managers currently have to double document their assessments due to Allscripts
not being interoperable with Epic. This
leads to long periods of documentation which takes away time that should be
used on facilitating patient discharges.
Delays in discharges is one of the main things that every hospital tries
to avoid. The daily cost of a delayed
discharge is $1,879 in the United States just for older patients alone
(Landeiro, Roberts, Gray & Leal, 2017).
By avoiding discharge delays the hospital would obviously be saving
money in the process. Most times case
managers are viewed as the gate keepers within a hospital. Their roles are vital in discharging patients
on a daily basis.
Also, the money used
to buy paper would be saved as well.
This may seem like a minor expense but it does add up over time. The amount of paper that is required to print
clinical documentations from Epic just to fax over and upload to Allscripts on
a daily basis is ridiculous. Any given
referral can consist of at least 30 to 40 pages of information. Just the idea of printing all of this
information just to discard the paperwork once uploaded to Allscripts is
maddening. The money that could be saved
could be used towards other projects that would help with improving patient
care.
Perhaps the most important impact that interoperability between Allscripts and Epic would have is improving patients’ satisfaction. One thing that definitely annoys patients and their families is when a healthcare staff is not on the same page. Imagine being told by the case manager that a certain rehab facility declined you because of your insurance, just to have a physician or nurse mistakenly tell you that you’re going to that same facility minutes later. This type of misinformation can form distrust amongst the patient towards the staff members; while making the healthcare staff look incompetent. That’s why it’s imperative for Allscripts to be interoperable with Epic so that the nurses and physicians can check on the status of referrals at any given time; so that everyone is on the same page. This would make more efficient use of everyone’s time as well. The quality of patient care would significantly improve if healthcare professionals are able to truly see everything that is going on with the patient.
References
CMS. (2019). 2019
Program requirements Medicare. Retrieved from
https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/2019ProgramRequirementsMedicare.html
CMS. (2018). 2018
Program requirements Medicare. Retrieved from
https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/2018ProgramRequirementsMedicare.html
EHRGuide. (2019).
Allscripts reviews. Retrieved from
https://ehrguide.org/ehr-reviews/allscripts-reviews/
HealthIT. (2014).
Epic interoperability fact sheet. Retrieved from
https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/facas/GSG_TestimonySupport_CarlDvorak_2014-08-15_04.pdf
Landeiro, F.,
Roberts, K., Gray, A.M., & Leal, J. (2017). Delayed hospital discharges of
older patients: A systematic review on prevalence and costs. The Gerontologist,
59(2), p. e86-e97. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnx028
Ultimate Medical
Academy. (2018). Interoperability and why it matters. Retrieved from
https://www.ultimatemedical.edu/blog/interoperability-matters/
Jalil,
ReplyDeleteThank you for your great blog !!! I thought it was very informative. Working in PACU/ACU I at times have had situations where pharmacy is not communicating with our EPIC system and there has been improvements but some still exists. I agree that there's no reason why the EHR system can be interoperable with the others, as this can become a safety issue and a concern of unreliable data. This can affect greatly the quality of care provided to our patients and can develop mistrust to patients in the healthcare system.
Christina P.
Jalil,
ReplyDeleteGreat post and topic about issues with interoperability. Before this class, it has never dawned on me how interoperability plays such a huge role in how we document and access medical records. It is redundant and unnecessary that a medical professional has to double document the same thing just because two systems aren't compatible. If there is no compatibility across the board, more time is consumed in trying to get information and documenting information, which can result in delay of patient care. In order to improve outcomes, facilities must make a change. Especially since making systems interoperable really has no downside, other than maybe cost. Facilities should instead think of it as a step towards improving patient outcomes instead of a budget issue.